Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
2.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 21(1): 67, 2023 Sep 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37716948

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters is growing due to their potential benefits. These devices can increase patient safety and satisfaction while reducing the use of resources. As a result, many hospitals are establishing vascular access specialist teams staffed by nurses who are trained in the insertion and maintenance of these catheters. The objective of the study is to evaluate previously to the implementation whether the benefits of introducing ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters, midline catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters compared to current practice by a vascular access specialist team outweigh their costs. METHODS: Cost-benefit analysis from the perspective of the healthcare provider based on administrative data. The study estimates the reduction in resources used when changing the current practice for the use of ultrasound-guided midline and PICC catheters, as well as the additional resources required for their use. RESULTS: The use of an ultrasound-guided device on peripherally inserted central carheter, results in a measurable resource reduction of approximately €31. When 3 peripheral venous catheters are replaced by an ultrasound-guided peripherally inserted central catheter, the saving is €63. Similarly, the use of an ultrasound-guided device on a midline catheter, results in a reduction of €16, while each ultrasound-guided midline catheter replacing 3 peripheral venous catheters results in a reduction of €96. CONCLUSION: The benefits of using ultrasound-guided midline and PICC catheters compared to current practice by introducing a vascular access specialist team trained in the implantation of ultrasound-guided catheters, outweigh its cost mainly because of the decrease in hospital stay due to the lowered risk of phebitis. These results motivate the implementation of the service, adding to previous experience suggesting that it is also preferable from the point of view of patient safety and satisfaction.

3.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 159(9): 426-431, noviembre 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-212236

RESUMO

Antecedente y objetivo: La higiene de manos (HM) es la medida más sencilla y eficaz para la prevención de la infección relacionada con la asistencia sanitaria. A pesar de ello, el cumplimiento en los profesionales sanitarios continúa siendo subóptimo. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el impacto de una estrategia multimodal de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ampliada en el cumplimiento de la HM en el personal sanitario.Material y métodosSe diseñó un estudio cuasiexperimental pretest-postest, llevando a cabo durante 2018 la estrategia multimodal de la OMS ampliada y dirigida a los profesionales de un hospital de tercer nivel. En esta estrategia, aparte de aplicar los 5 pilares de la OMS, se realizó un vídeo, la administración del cuestionario de percepciones de la OMS y un incentivo al servicio/unidad con mejor cumplimiento, añadiendo a la formación una modalidad de talleres prácticos. Se compararon los porcentajes de cumplimiento del año 2017 y 2018.ResultadosEn el año 2017 se observaron 1.056 oportunidades, registrándose 631 acciones de HM, siendo el cumplimiento global del 60% (IC 95% 56,7-62,7). En el año 2018, con 1.481 oportunidades observadas y 1.111 acciones de HM, el cumplimiento fue del 75% (IC 95% 72,7-77,2) (p<0,001). Este cumplimiento se incrementó en todos los estamentos y en todas las indicaciones.ConclusionesLa aplicación de una estrategia multimodal ampliada tiene un impacto positivo en el cumplimiento de HM. Se deben dirigir estrategias a los estamentos con peor cumplimiento y de forma continuada en el tiempo. (AU)


Background and objective: Hand hygiene (HH) is the simplest and most effective measure for the prevention of infection related to healthcare. Despite this, compliance in healthcare professionals continues to be suboptimal. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of an expanded World Health Organization (WHO) multimodal strategy on HH compliance in healthcare personnel.Material and methodsA quasi-experimental before-after study was designed, carrying out the expanded WHO multimodal strategy in 2018, aimed at professionals in a tertiary hospital. In this strategy, apart from applying the 5 pillars of the WHO, a video was made, the administration of the WHO perceptions questionnaire and an incentive to the service/unit with better compliance, adding to the training a modality of practical workshops. The compliance percentages for 2017 and 2018 were compared.ResultsIn 2017, 1056 opportunities were observed, registering 631 HH actions, with global compliance of 60% (95% CI 56.7-62.7). In 2018, with 1481 opportunities observed and 1111 HH actions, compliance was 75% (95% CI 72.7-77.2) (P<.001). This compliance increased in all professional categories and in all indications.ConclusionsThe application of an expanded multimodal strategy has a positive impact on HH compliance. Strategies should be directed to the categories with the worst compliance and continuously over time. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Higiene das Mãos , Pessoal de Saúde , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Atenção à Saúde
4.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(11): 2181-2189, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36191608

RESUMO

We compared hospital-acquired catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) episodes diagnosed at acute care hospitals in Catalonia, Spain, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 with those detected during 2007-2019. We compared the annual observed and predicted CRB rates by using the negative binomial regression model and calculated stratified annual root mean squared errors. A total of 10,030 episodes were diagnosed during 2007-2020. During 2020, the observed CRB incidence rate was 0.29/103 patient-days, whereas the predicted CRB rate was 0.14/103 patient-days. The root mean squared error was 0.153. Thus, a substantial increase in hospital-acquired CRB cases was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 compared with the rate predicted from 2007-2019. The incidence rate was expected to increase by 1.07 (95% CI 1-1.15) for every 1,000 COVID-19-related hospital admissions. We recommend maintaining all CRB prevention efforts regardless of the coexistence of other challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , COVID-19 , Humanos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Incidência , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Bacteriemia/etiologia , Cateteres/efeitos adversos
5.
Microorganisms ; 10(5)2022 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35630517

RESUMO

Our aim was to determine changes in the incidence of CD infection (CDI) following the introduction of a two-step diagnostic algorithm and to analyze CDI cases diagnosed in the study period. We retrospectively studied CDI (January 2009 to July 2018) in adults diagnosed by toxin enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (2009−2012) or toxin-EIA + polymerase chain reaction (PCR) algorithm (2013 onwards). A total of 443 patients with a first episode of CDI were included, 297 (67.1%) toxin-EIA-positive and 146 (32.9%) toxin-EIA-negative/PCR-positive were only identified through the two-step algorithm including the PCR test. The incidence of CDI increased from 0.9 to 4.7/10,000 patient-days (p < 0.01) and 146 (32.9%) toxin-negative CDI were diagnosed. Testing rate increased from 24.4 to 59.5/10,000 patient-days (p < 0.01) and the percentage of positive stools rose from 3.9% to 12.5% (p < 0.01). CD toxin-positive patients had a higher frequency of severe presentation and a lower rate of immunosuppressive drugs and inflammatory bowel disease. Mortality (16.3%) was significantly higher in patients with hematological neoplasm, intensive care unit admission and complicated disease. Recurrences (14.9%) were significantly higher with proton pump inhibitor exposure. The two-step diagnostic algorithm facilitates earlier diagnosis, potentially impacting patient outcomes and nosocomial spread. CD-toxin-positive patients had a more severe clinical presentation, probably due to increased CD bacterial load with higher toxin concentration. This early and easy marker should alert clinicians of potentially more severe outcomes.

6.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 159(9): 426-431, 2022 11 11.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35210097

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hand hygiene (HH) is the simplest and most effective measure for the prevention of infection related to healthcare. Despite this, compliance in healthcare professionals continues to be suboptimal. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of an expanded World Health Organization (WHO) multimodal strategy on HH compliance in healthcare personnel. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A quasi-experimental before-after study was designed, carrying out the expanded WHO multimodal strategy in 2018, aimed at professionals in a tertiary hospital. In this strategy, apart from applying the 5 pillars of the WHO, a video was made, the administration of the WHO perceptions questionnaire and an incentive to the service/unit with better compliance, adding to the training a modality of practical workshops. The compliance percentages for 2017 and 2018 were compared. RESULTS: In 2017, 1056 opportunities were observed, registering 631 HH actions, with global compliance of 60% (95% CI 56.7-62.7). In 2018, with 1481 opportunities observed and 1111 HH actions, compliance was 75% (95% CI 72.7-77.2) (P<.001). This compliance increased in all professional categories and in all indications. CONCLUSIONS: The application of an expanded multimodal strategy has a positive impact on HH compliance. Strategies should be directed to the categories with the worst compliance and continuously over time.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Higiene das Mãos , Humanos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Controle de Infecções , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Pessoal de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...